Walk into any tech conference today and you’ll hear the phrase “I’m in AI” tossed around like free swag. For one person, it means training a custom large language model. For another, it’s dropping ChatGPT prompts into email marketing. Both are “in AI,” but the gap between those two realities is a canyon.
That canyon matters because the hype window is closing. The winners in this next phase won’t be the ones dabbling. They’ll be the ones that turn AI from a side hustle into the backbone of how their business runs.
The Three Tribes of AI
You can sort almost every AI initiative into three camps:
- Builders make the models, infrastructure, and algorithms.
- Integrators embed AI into workflows, products, and services.
- Users apply off-the-shelf tools for personal productivity.
The language is fuzzy, but the difference is decisive. A product manager who pastes meeting notes into Claude is a user. A COO who redesigns supply chain planning so demand sensing and inventory decisions run natively on AI is an integrator. Only one of those is operationalizing AI.
What Operationalization Really Means
Operationalizing AI is not sprinkling an API on a legacy workflow. It’s asking: If we could design this organization today, knowing what AI can do, what would it look like?
Sometimes the answer is “that process shouldn’t exist at all.” That’s the leap most companies never make. They think “add AI to the process” instead of “re-engineer or delete the process.”
Why Most Companies Get It Backwards
Think of the Segway. Brilliant engineering strapped onto the assumptions of walking. It was supposed to reinvent transportation, but instead it became a niche toy because it didn’t rethink the larger system—roads, sidewalks, cities.
That’s what happens when you bolt AI onto the old ways of working. You inherit all the inefficiencies, and in some cases, amplify them.
The Fitness Analogy for AI Capability
Becoming AI-native is more like training for a sport than buying a gadget:
- Equipment: AI tools, data infrastructure, security, and integration.
- Trainer: People who know AI and your business realities.
- Program: A phased capability-building plan.
- Patience: Measured in quarters and years, not weeks.
- Consistency: Ongoing commitment, not one-off pilots.
You don’t get fit because you bought a Peloton. You get fit because you ride it every day under a program that makes sense for your goals.
The Hard Part Begins
The magic-show phase is over. Now comes the hard graft of weaving AI into messy, cross-functional operations. That’s a design problem before it’s a technical one.
It demands questioning assumptions, cutting waste, and rebuilding from first principles. If you skip that work, you’ll end up with shiny dashboards feeding bad decisions.
The Competitive Divide
Future winners will be AI-native organizations—companies that treat AI like electricity: invisible, embedded, always evolving. They’ll continuously adapt as capabilities grow, and they’ll design for AI from the start, not retrofit after the fact.
The rest will stay stuck in “user” mode, mistaking tool adoption for transformation while competitors reinvent the underlying business model.
Actionable Steps for Leaders
- Audit your position. Be brutally honest—are you a Builder, Integrator, or User?
- Pick one core workflow and redesign it from scratch with AI as a native component.
- Build a capability roadmap with the discipline of a long-term training program—clear milestones, owners, and metrics.
- Assign real ownership for AI outcomes. No more “innovation committees” without teeth.
The Challenge
You can keep “playing with AI” the way hobbyists play with Raspberry Pis. Or you can rebuild your organization so AI is the silent partner in every decision, every process, every customer touchpoint.
One of those paths leads to a press release. The other leads to a competitive advantage your rivals won’t be able to copy.
The clock’s already running. Which side of the divide are you going to land on?
Leave a Reply